Analisis Komparasi Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Distributor Barang Gudang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v6i1.925Keywords:
SAW; TOPSIS; Decision Making; Distributor; MCDM; Warehouse ManagementAbstract
Distributor selection is a strategic decision in supply chain management that affects product availability, operational costs, and customer satisfaction. This study aims to compare and evaluate distributor selection decision-making using two Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, namely Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Primary data was obtained through structured interviews with three expert practitioners at a distribution company. Five evaluation criteria were used: product quality (weight 0.30), product price (0.20), delivery accuracy (0.20), service response (0.15), and stock availability (0.15). Ten distributor alternatives were assessed using a 1–10 scale and processed independently using SAW normalization and TOPSIS vector normalization to generate rankings from each method. The results show that PT. Mitra Listrik Nusantara ranked first in both methods with a SAW score of 0.9414 and a TOPSIS score of 0.8057. Ranking consistency comparison through Spearman correlation analysis yielded a value of ? = 0.9515, indicating very high agreement between the two methods. This study provides practical contributions to warehouse management in adopting a data-driven approach for measurable and accountable distributor selection.
Downloads
References
D. Zurell et al., “A Standard Protocol for Reporting Species Distribution Models,” Ecography, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1261–1277, 2020, doi: 10.1111/ecog.04960.
S. Vignali, A. G. Barras, and V. Braunisch, “SDMtune?: An R package to Tune and Evaluate Species Distribution Models,” Ecology and Evolution, vol. 10, no. 20, pp. 11488–11506, 2020, doi: 10.1002/ece3.6786.
Suratni and P. A. Ismiralda, “Evaluasi Pengadaan Obat Dilihat Dari Pelayanan Distributor Farmasi Di Rsia Kemang Medical Care Jakarta Selatan,” Farmasi-Qu: Jurnal Pelayanan Kefarmasian, vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 1-10 ,2020. [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.akfarbhumihusada.ac.id/index.php/BHJ/article/view/52
M. I. Sudarman, “Usulan Pemilihan Jasa Ekspedisi Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Analytical Network Process (F-Anp) Di Perusahaan Distributor Alat Berat,” Skripsi, Program Studi Teknik Industri, Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://etd.lib.itenas.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=16282
V. A. P. Salomon, E. Loche, S. A. Gazale, and V. M. Palermo, “Warehouse Location for Product Distribution by E-Commerce: A Multi-Criteria Approach,” Symmetry, vol. 14, no. 9, 2022, doi: 10.3390/sym14091843.
D. P. Putro, P. E. Suryani, and S. Amri, “Comparative Analysis of AHP, SAW, TOPSIS, VIKOR, and MABAC in Pharmaceutical Supplier Selection,” Jurnal Transformatika, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2025, doi: 10.26623/transformatika.v23i1.12220.
J. Leng et al., “Digital Twin-Driven Joint Optimisation of Packing and Storage Assignment in Large-Scale Automated High-Rise Warehouse Product-Service System,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 34, no. 7–8, pp. 783–800, 2021, doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2019.1667032.
C. Chien, Y. Lin, and S. Lin, “Deep Reinforcement Learning For Selecting Demand Forecast Models to Empower Industry 3.5 and an Empirical Study for a Semiconductor Component Distributor,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 58, no. 9, pp.2784-2804, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1733125.
E. Evcioglu and Ö. Kabak, “Supplier Selection in Supply Chain Network Using MCDM Methods,” Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 41, pp. 172–183, 2023, doi: 10.14744/sigma.2023.00013.
M. J. L. Roselli, R. P. Silva, and R. Castro, “Considering Strategic Operational Objectives in Supplier Selection: A TOPSIS-Based Approach, ”Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2025, doi: 10.1002/mcda.70018.
H. F. Fitriyani, Wijayanto, and Suhartono, “GDSS Penilaian Kinerja Supplier Menggunakan SAW dan Borda,” Jurnal SISFOKOM, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 108–115, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.atmaluhur.ac.id/index.php/siskom/article/view/1382
M. Andreji, M. Jankovic, D. Damnjanovic, and D. Sceulovs, “Distribution Channel Selection Using FUCOM-ADAM?: A Novel Approach,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 19, p. 14527, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151914527.
B. D. Rouyendegh, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Green Supplier Selection Problem,” Soft Computing, vol. 24, No. 3, pp.2215-2228, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00500-019-04054-8.
Rafly Zuhdi Setyawan, “Evaluasi Pemilihan Supplier Kemasan Botol Regular Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) (Studi Kasus: Pt. Xyz),” Industrial Engineering Online Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/ieoj/article/view/42533
H. Nurranto and W. Estiningsih, “Evaluasi Terhadap Prosedur Penerimaan dan Pengeluaran Barang Dengan Sistem Pengendalian Internal di PT Suzuya,” Jurnal JEKMA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 120–129, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://garuda.kemdiktisaintek.go.id/documents/detail/4332165
M. L. Demircan and B. Özcan, “A Proposed Method to Evaluate Warehouse Location for 3PL Cold Chain Suppliers in Gulf Countries Using Neutrosophic Fuzzy EDAS,” Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., pp. 1–22, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s44196-021-00041-w.
M. H. Hatala, “Evaluasi dan Perbandingan Kinerja Manajemen Gudang di Garut Menggunakan Integrasi Metode AHP-SAW,” Jurnal Kalibrasi, pp. 9–19, 2025, doi: 10.33364/kalibrasi/v.23-2.2656.
E. Bottani, M. Di Nardo, L. Monferdini, and T. Murino, “Mapping LARGS Criteria and Relationships for Supplier Selection Using a Fuzzy Hybrid Approach,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 206, p. 111252, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2025.111252.
S. Kusi-Sarpong, H. Gupta, and C. J. C. Jabbour, “Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on Industry 4.0 Initiatives Within the Context of Circular Economy Implementation in Supply Chain Operations,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 999–1019, 2023, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2021.1980906.
C. Acciarini, F. Brunetta, and S. Boccardelli, “Cognitive Biases and Decision-Making Strategies in Times of Change: A Systematic Literature Review,” Management Decision, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 638–652, 2021, doi: 10.1108/MD-07-2019-1006.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Komparasi Metode SAW Dan TOPSIS Dalam Pemilihan Distributor Barang Gudang
ARTICLE HISTORY
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Fahreza Dandy Sihmawanto, Ganef Tri Wijayatno, Prind Triajeng Pungkasanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
