Komparasi Kinerja Algoritma Machine Learning dalam Memprediksi Posisi Finish Pembalap Formula 1


Authors

  • Rizkya Nanda Prakoso Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ade Priyatna Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Ridatu Ocanitra Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v6i5.1190

Keywords:

Formula 1; Machine Learning; Ridge Regression; Support Vector Regression; Random Forest Regression; Finish Position Prediction

Abstract

Formula 1 is a motorsport competition with high complexity in determining drivers’ finish positions. Research on Formula 1 finish position prediction using regression approaches remains limited compared to classification, leaving its performance underexplored. This study aims to compare the performance of Ridge Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Random Forest Regression in predicting Formula 1 drivers’ finish positions, identify key factors, and predict finish positions at the 2026 Miami Grand Prix. The dataset, sourced from Kaggle, comprises historical Formula 1 data from 2021-2025 and data from the first three 2026 season races. This study applies preprocessing, feature engineering, feature selection, hyperparameter tuning, model evaluation, and interpretation of the best model using Permutation Feature Importance and SHAP. Results show that SVR performed best, with MAE 2.8685, RMSE 4.0919, R2 0.4946, MAPE 37.2987%, and Pearson Correlation Coefficient 0.7233. SVR’s MAE and MAPE outperformed Ridge Regression (MAE 3.1000; MAPE 56.8081%) and Random Forest Regression (MAE 3.1611; MAPE 57.6259%), although this MAPE remains high. Position Qualifying was the most influential feature, followed by Driver Rank Previous, Constructor Rank Previous, and Grid. In the 2026 Miami Grand Prix forecasting, SVR successfully predicted the race winner, although prediction gaps remained considerable for several drivers. This study contributes a comparative framework of linear and non-linear regression models for predicting Formula 1 finish positions, an aspect not widely explored, along with prediction interpretation using PFI and SHAP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Jafri, “Predicting Formula 1 Race Outcomes?: A Machine Learning Approach,” New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://aliabdullahjafri.com/static/media/Ali_Jafri_CapstoneProject1_Fall2024.c7244022875d46bec5d9.pdf

J. Weissbock and S. Mills, “Re-evaluating the Qualifying / Finish Relationship in Formula One?: A Replication and Correction of Prior Findings,” Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2507.10966.

S. A. Krzyszto? and J. Smo?ka, “Application of machine learning for predicting Formula 1 race results,” J. Comput. Sci. Inst., vol. 38, pp. 81–86, 2026, doi: 10.35784/jcsi.8462.

P. Shelke, R. Mirajkar, A. Pande, and K. Yash, “F1 Race Winner Predictor,” in 2023 7th International Conference on Computing, Communication, Control and Automation (ICCUBEA), Pune, Maharashtra, India: IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/ICCUBEA58933.2023.10392224.

A. R. Patro, R. Sahana, S. Gautam, and R. Sapna, “A Predictive Analysis of lap time in Formula 1 using Machine Learning,” in 2025 IEEE 6th India Council International Subsections Conference (INDISCON), Bengaluru, India: IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/INDISCON66021.2025.11252332.

H. Sicoie, “Machine Learning framework for Formula 1 race winner and championship standings predictor,” Tilburg University, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=157635

D. Chopra and R. Khurana, Introduction to Machine Learning with Python. New Delhi: Bentham Science Publishers Pte. Ltd. Singapore, 2023. doi: 10.2174/97898151244221230101.

A. Muzakir, K. Adi, and R. Kusumaningrum, Penerapan Konsep Machine Learning & Deep Learning, 1st ed. Semarang: UNDIP Press, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://adsii.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Penerapan-Konsep-Machine-Learning-Deep-Learning-Ari-Muzakir-et-al.pdf

A. A. A. Daniswara and I. K. D. Nuryana, “Data Preprocessing Pola Pada Penilaian Mahasiswa Program Profesi Guru,” J. Informatics Comput. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97–100, 2023, doi: 10.26740/jinacs.v5n01.p97-100.

C. Haryanto, N. Rahaningsih, and F. M. Basysyar, “Komparasi Algoritma Machine Learning Dalam Memprediksi Harga Rumah,” JATI (Jurnal Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 533–539, 2023, doi: 10.36040/jati.v7i1.6343.

J. P. Bharadiya, “The Role of Machine Learning in Transforming Business Intelligence,” Int. J. Comput. Artif. Intell., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–24, 2023, doi: 10.33545/27076571.2023.v4.i1a.60.

F. Putra, H. F. Tahiyat, R. M. Ihsan, Rahmaddeni, and L. Efrizoni, “Penerapan Algoritma K-Nearest Neighbor Menggunakan Wrapper Sebagai Preprocessing untuk Penentuan Keterangan Berat Badan Manusia Febrianda,” MALCOM Indones. J. Mach. Learn. Comput. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 273–281, 2024, doi: 10.57152/malcom.v4i1.1085.

M. A. Latief and Y. Karyanti, “Data Mining & Analytic Forecasting Indeks Standar Pencemar Udara Jakarta Menggunakan Metode Linear Regression (Studi Kasus: Dataset Indeks Standar Pencemar Udara Jakarta 2021),” JOSR J. Soc. Res., vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 1164–1174, 2022, doi: 10.55324/josr.v1i10.248.

M. P. Kusuma and A. Kudus, “Penerapan Metode Support Vector Regression (SVR) pada Data Survival KPR PT. Bank ABC, Tbk.,” Bandung Conf. Ser. Stat., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 2022, doi: 10.29313/bcss.v2i2.3614.

D. Manurung, B. Zealtiel, and A. H. Lubis, “Prediksi Produksi Tanaman Padi di Indonesia dengan Menggunakan Algoritma Random Forest Regressor,” J. Comput. Informatics Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 337–345, 2025, doi: 10.47065/comforch.v4i3.2125.

A. Q. Md, S. Kulkarni, C. J. Joshua, T. Vaichole, S. Mohan, and C. Iwendi, “Enhanced Preprocessing Approach Using Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms for Detecting Liver Disease,” Biomedicines, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1–23, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ biomedicines11020581.

S. A. N. Cahyo and M. Y. T. Sulistyono, “Comparison of Multiple Linear Regression and Random Forest Methods for Predicting National Rice Production in Indonesia,” J. Appl. Informatics Comput., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 3479–3489, 2025, doi: 10.30871/jaic.v9i6.11398.

T. A. D. Kurniawan, A. Setiawan, and F. Tita, “Perbandingan Kinerja Metode Support Vector Regression dan Metode Regresi Linier Berganda dalam Memprediksi BMI pada Dataset ASTHMA,” J. Sains dan Edukasi Sains, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 133–142, 2025, doi: 10.24246/juses.v8i2p133-142.

K. Mei, M. Tan, Z. Yang, and S. Shi, “Modeling of Feature Selection Based on Random Forest Algorithm and Pearson Correlation Coefficient,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2219, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2219/1/012046.

A. Khan, A. Ali, J. Khan, F. Ullah, and M. Faheem, “Using Permutation-Based Feature Importance for Improved Machine Learning Model Performance at Reduced Costs,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 36421–36435, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3544625.

Y. Huang et al., “Multiparametric MRI model to predict molecular subtypes of breast cancer using Shapley additive explanations interpretability analysis,” Diagn. Interv. Imaging, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 191–205, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2024.01.004.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Komparasi Kinerja Algoritma Machine Learning dalam Memprediksi Posisi Finish Pembalap Formula 1

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY

Published: 2026-08-09

Abstract View: 0 times
PDF Download: 0 times

How to Cite

Prakoso, R. N., Priyatna, A., & Ocanitra, R. . (2026). Komparasi Kinerja Algoritma Machine Learning dalam Memprediksi Posisi Finish Pembalap Formula 1. Bulletin of Computer Science Research, 6(5), 1896-1908. https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v6i5.1190

Issue

Section

Articles